Ⅳ。Dataanalysisteiques:__________________________________________
&ofstudy:____________________________________________________
A。___________________________________________________________________________
B。___________________________________________________________________________
C。___________________________________________________________________________
&hisreportwastoieUniLabstaffattitudestoersonalmobilephoaffaings。Astaffsurveyoowardstheuseofmobilephoaffteammeetingswasducted。TheresultsihemajorityofstafffindmobilephoneuseisaseriousproblemihereportcludesthatpersonalmobilephoiveandshouldbeturnedoffiisreeUniLabdevelopsapanypoligtheuseofmobilephoiionalces。
Introdu
Therehasbeenamassiveiheuseofpersonalmobilephohepastfiveyearsandthereiseveryindithatthiswillue。AgtoBlack(2002)by2008almost1peopleinAustraliaersonalmobilephones。Blackdescribesthisphenomenonas“seriousireme,potentiallyuhefoundationsofunioursociety”(2002,p。167)。
&lyaaffhaveplaiheuseofpersonalmobilephoingsaheoffipanypolieffect,thereisnooffipanypphohisreportexamiheissueofmobilephoaffmeetings。Itdoesoexamiheuseofmobilephoheworkplaes,althoughsomes>
Forthepurposesofthisreportapersonalmobilephoneisapersonallyfundedphoneforprivatecallsasopposedtoanemployerfudirectlyrelatestoutaparticularjob。
&hods
ThisresearductedbyquestionnaireaedUniLabstaffmembers’attitudestotheuseofmobilephoaffteammeetings。Atotalof412questioributedwithemplhtlypayslips。Thequestioscalestoassesssocialattitudes(Smith2002)tomobilephoneusageandprovidedopen-endedresponsesforadditios。Surveyboxeswereloeverybranchforafour-weekperiod。Nopersonalinformationwascollected;thesurveywasvoluntaryandanonymous。
&s
Therewasan85%respohequestiobeclearlyseesthatmobilephonesaresideredtobedisruptiveandshouldbeturnedoffiings。
Thesurveyalsoalloaifyanyceswheremobilephonesshouldbeallowediingsandalsoassessedstaffattitudestpersonalphonestaffmeetingsinopeiosshowedthatstaffthoughtthatiances,e。g。medicaltreatmentencies,regpersonalphonecallstable,butgenerallyregpersonalphonecallswasnotnecessary。
Diss
Itbeseenthatpersonalmobilephoneuseissideredtoaproblem;holedgedthatiionsitshouldbepermissible。80%ofretssideredmobilephoobehighlydisruptivearongsupportforphournedoffiings(85%)。Only12%thoughtthatmobilephoaffaingsroblem,whereas85%feltitwasaseriousissue。Theresultsaretthroughoutthesurvey。Manyoftherespos(62%)feltthatiionalcesmobilephonesshouldbeallowed,e。g。medicaltreatment,butthereshouldbeprthis。Thesefientwithpreviousstudies。AgtoSmith(2005)manypaifiedmobilephonesasdisruptiveaheuseofmobilephoings。Havir(2004)claimsthat29%ofstaffmeetiefullyspentthroughunnecessarymobilephoions。Thisaffectstimema,produdteamfocus。
Theuseofmobilephoaffmeetingsisclearlydisruptiveandtheyshouldbeswitoststafffeltitisoreceivepersonalphonestaffmeetiuainces,butpermissionshouldfirstbesoughtfromtheteamleader,managerorchair。
Assig
1。Visitt。ihm。eduPDFhodology。pdf,wherethereisfileaboutthedetaileddesofresearchmethodology。Readandkhecharacteristicsofresearch。
2。Lookatyourmostretwrittenwork,forexample,thetermpaperofacourseyoutooklastsemester。Rereadyourquestionnaireaagtowhathasbeehepresentunit。